Competitor profile

RAMESH KUMAR-kanhiya lal and sons

They win 4% of what they bid, and 3% of the value they chase.

175tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
24 Jun 2014last award
Total bids
174
175 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
7
45 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹40.4 L
of ₹12.7 Cr bid — 3.2% conversion
Win rate
4.0%
of 174 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count174 bids
70.1%
25.9%
Awarded74.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected12270.1%
Lost4525.9%
By value₹12.7 Cr
66.2%
30.6%
Awarded₹40.4 L3.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹8.4 Cr66.2%
Lost₹3.9 Cr30.6%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Delhi₹40.4 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
VISHWAS KUMAR AZAD18 wins · 141 shared tenders
₹1.3 Cr
won head-to-head
02
Nawab Singh Bhati-Phoenix Constructions0 wins · 117 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Mahender Kumar4 wins · 110 shared tenders
₹17.9 L
won head-to-head
04
Mohan Kumar4 wins · 82 shared tenders
₹14.3 L
won head-to-head
05
Narender Singh Yadav11 wins · 79 shared tenders
₹34.0 L
won head-to-head
06
Rajesh Chandra Rawat6 wins · 76 shared tenders
₹29.1 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedRAMESH KUMAR-kanhiya awardedOthers

About RAMESH KUMAR-kanhiya lal and sons

RAMESH KUMAR-kanhiya lal and sons appears as a bidder on 175 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 174 decided bids, it was awarded 7 — a 4.0% win rate — worth ₹40.4 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 24 Jun 2014.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Public Works Department, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Delhi. On priced bids, its median quote is 16.7% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against VISHWAS KUMAR AZAD, Nawab Singh Bhati-Phoenix Constructions and Mahender Kumar. VISHWAS KUMAR AZAD bid on 141 of the same tenders and won 18 of them; RAMESH KUMAR-kanhiya lal and sons won 6.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.