Competitor profile

RAJENDRA NANAJI DEORE

They win 67% of what they bid, but only 54% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

3tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
17 Apr 2026last award
Total bids
3
3 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹24.0 L
of ₹44.4 L bid — 54.1% conversion
Win rate
66.7%
of 3 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count3 bids
66.7%
33.3%
Awarded266.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost133.3%
By value₹44.4 L
54.1%
45.9%
Awarded₹24.0 L54.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹20.4 L45.9%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Public Works Region₹16.0 L66.5%
RDD-CEO-NASHIK₹8.1 L33.5%

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹24.0 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
RAGINI RAJENDRA DEORE0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
PAWAN UTTAM GHULE1 win · 1 shared tender
₹18.4 L
won head-to-head
03
Vishal Janardan Patil0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Sankarshan Ravindra Bhosale0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Shreyas Raosaheb Zalte Patil0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedRAJENDRA NANAJI awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to RAJENDRA NANAJI

About RAJENDRA NANAJI DEORE

RAJENDRA NANAJI DEORE appears as a bidder on 3 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 3 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 66.7% win rate — worth ₹24.0 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 17 Apr 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Public Works Region, at 66.5% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 5.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against RAGINI RAJENDRA DEORE, PAWAN UTTAM GHULE and Vishal Janardan Patil. RAGINI RAJENDRA DEORE bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; RAJENDRA NANAJI DEORE won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.