Competitor profile

PAWAN UTTAM GHULE

They win 44% of what they bid, and 46% of the value they chase.

9tenders on record
5buyer authorities
1state
30 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
9
9 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹79.7 L
of ₹1.7 Cr bid — 45.6% conversion
Win rate
44.4%
of 9 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count9 bids
44.4%
11.1%
44.4%
Awarded444.4%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected111.1%
Lost444.4%
By value₹1.7 Cr
45.6%
52.2%
Awarded₹79.7 L45.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹3.7 L2.1%
Lost₹91.2 L52.2%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Public Works Region₹18.4 L23.1%

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹79.7 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SAMEER SUDHAKAR DIXIT1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹19.3 L
won head-to-head
02
VISHAL GOKUL PARDESHI0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
₹0
won head-to-head
04
TEJAS DNYANESHWAR ZAMBARE0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
D P MORE ENGINEER AND CONTRACTOR0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
VIJAY DILIP NAGARE0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedPAWAN UTTAM awardedOthers

About PAWAN UTTAM GHULE

PAWAN UTTAM GHULE appears as a bidder on 9 government tenders on record, from 5 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 9 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 44.4% win rate — worth ₹79.7 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 30 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Of Municipal Administration, at 59.2% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SAMEER SUDHAKAR DIXIT, VISHAL GOKUL PARDESHI and M/S. SHREE SAPTASHRUNGI MATA CONSTRUCTION PROP. DIPAK SHIVAJI PAWAR. SAMEER SUDHAKAR DIXIT bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; PAWAN UTTAM GHULE won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.