Competitor profile

Rajeev Garg-M/s MG Tools

They win 4% of what they bid, and 3% of the value they chase.

81tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
11 May 2015last award
Total bids
80
81 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
45 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹17.9 L
of ₹5.8 Cr bid — 3.1% conversion
Win rate
3.8%
of 80 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count80 bids
40.0%
56.3%
Awarded33.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected3240.0%
Lost4556.3%
By value₹5.8 Cr
38.4%
58.5%
Awarded₹17.9 L3.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.2 Cr38.4%
Lost₹3.4 Cr58.5%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Delhi₹17.9 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Vivek Associates-Vivek Associates10 wins · 66 shared tenders
₹1.0 Cr
won head-to-head
02
₹10.3 L
won head-to-head
03
Sudhir Kant Seth-Shaka Electrical (India)10 wins · 44 shared tenders
₹45.5 L
won head-to-head
04
Rajiv Kumar Bagga-Bagga Enterprises0 wins · 37 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Ram Singh Kashyap-Kashyap Electricals0 wins · 34 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
₹8.0 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedRajeev Garg-M/s awardedOthers

About Rajeev Garg-M/s MG Tools

Rajeev Garg-M/s MG Tools appears as a bidder on 81 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 80 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 3.8% win rate — worth ₹17.9 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 11 May 2015.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Public Works Department, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Delhi. On priced bids, its median quote is 20.9% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Vivek Associates-Vivek Associates, MANOJ KUMAR-KUMAR ELECTRICALS AND REFRIGRATION WORKS and Sudhir Kant Seth-Shaka Electrical (India). Vivek Associates-Vivek Associates bid on 66 of the same tenders and won 10 of them; Rajeev Garg-M/s MG Tools won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.