Competitor profile

M/s. R.S. Sikarwar

They win 22% of what they bid, and 18% of the value they chase.

41tenders on record
6buyer authorities
0states
7 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
41
41 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
9
25 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.3 Cr
of ₹12.4 Cr bid — 18.2% conversion
Win rate
21.9%
of 41 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count41 bids
22.0%
17.1%
61.0%
Awarded922.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected717.1%
Lost2561.0%
By value₹12.4 Cr
18.2%
25.0%
56.7%
Awarded₹2.3 Cr18.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹3.1 Cr25.0%
Lost₹7.0 Cr56.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

9 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s A P Management Services8 wins · 21 shared tenders
₹2.2 Cr
won head-to-head
02
M/s HARIOM ENTERPRISES3 wins · 19 shared tenders
₹1.8 Cr
won head-to-head
03
RIC Projects Pvt. Ltd.1 win · 14 shared tenders
₹51.6 L
won head-to-head
04
NARENDER KUMAR1 win · 13 shared tenders
₹31.4 L
won head-to-head
05
JS Enterprises0 wins · 13 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Archana Enterprises2 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹43.6 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedR.S. Sikarwar awardedOthers

About M/s. R.S. Sikarwar

M/s. R.S. Sikarwar appears as a bidder on 41 government tenders on record, from 6 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 41 decided bids, it was awarded 9 — a 21.9% win rate — worth ₹2.3 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 7 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Defence Research and Development Organisation, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against M/s A P Management Services, M/s HARIOM ENTERPRISES and RIC Projects Pvt. Ltd.. M/s A P Management Services bid on 21 of the same tenders and won 8 of them; M/s. R.S. Sikarwar won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.