Competitor profile

M/S NARENDER KUMAR

They win 11% of what they bid, and 5% of the value they chase.

19tenders on record
3buyer authorities
0states
11 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
19
19 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
12 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹41.8 L
of ₹7.7 Cr bid — 5.4% conversion
Win rate
10.5%
of 19 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count19 bids
10.5%
26.3%
63.2%
Awarded210.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected526.3%
Lost1263.2%
By value₹7.7 Cr
35.4%
59.2%
Awarded₹41.8 L5.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.7 Cr35.4%
Lost₹4.6 Cr59.2%

Where they win

2 authorities · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

NHPC Limited₹10.4 L24.9%

Operating states

LowHigh

2 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s R S Sikarwar4 wins · 13 shared tenders
₹1.5 Cr
won head-to-head
02
RIC Projects Pvt. Ltd.0 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M/s HARIOM ENTERPRISES3 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹1.8 Cr
won head-to-head
04
M/s A P Management Services2 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹17.6 L
won head-to-head
05
JS Enterprises0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
SANJEEV CONSTRUCTIONS0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNARENDER KUMAR awardedOthers

About M/S NARENDER KUMAR

M/S NARENDER KUMAR appears as a bidder on 19 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 19 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 10.5% win rate — worth ₹41.8 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 11 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Defence Research and Development Organisation, at 75.1% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against M/s R S Sikarwar, RIC Projects Pvt. Ltd. and M/s HARIOM ENTERPRISES. M/s R S Sikarwar bid on 13 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; M/S NARENDER KUMAR won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.