Competitor profile

R.M. ENGINEERING

They win 35% of what they bid, and 42% of the value they chase.

18tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
5 Mar 2026last award
Total bids
17
18 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
6
11 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.0 Cr
of ₹7.3 Cr bid — 41.6% conversion
Win rate
35.3%
of 17 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count17 bids
35.3%
64.7%
Awarded635.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost1164.7%
By value₹7.3 Cr
41.6%
58.4%
Awarded₹3.0 Cr41.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹4.2 Cr58.4%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
West Bengal₹3.0 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
ALAM ENTERPRISE2 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹1.4 Cr
won head-to-head
02
BHARAT CONSTRUCTION3 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹1.1 Cr
won head-to-head
03
S. R. ENTERPRISE2 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹5.9 L
won head-to-head
04
UNIQUE CONSTRUCTION2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹5.3 L
won head-to-head
05
DIAMOND CONSTRUCTION1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹1.5 L
won head-to-head
06
MODERN ENTERPRISE0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedR.M. ENGINEERING awardedOthers

About R.M. ENGINEERING

R.M. ENGINEERING appears as a bidder on 18 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 17 decided bids, it was awarded 6 — a 35.3% win rate — worth ₹3.0 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 5 Mar 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is KOLKATA METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, at 98.5% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from West Bengal. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against ALAM ENTERPRISE, BHARAT CONSTRUCTION and S. R. ENTERPRISE. ALAM ENTERPRISE bid on 12 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; R.M. ENGINEERING won 5.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.