Competitor profile

Prajna Group

They win 13% of what they bid, and 11% of the value they chase.

23tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
10 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
23
23 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
19 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹79.5 L
of ₹7.2 Cr bid — 11.1% conversion
Win rate
13.0%
of 23 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count23 bids
13.0%
82.6%
Awarded313.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected14.3%
Lost1982.6%
By value₹7.2 Cr
11.1%
84.9%
Awarded₹79.5 L11.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹28.7 L4.0%
Lost₹6.1 Cr84.9%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Public Works Region₹10.9 L13.6%

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹79.5 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
MRV Construction4 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹1.2 Cr
won head-to-head
02
Akhil Shivkumar Atulkar0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
gaurav0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
LAKSH CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Sejal Fattulal Kanoje1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹10.9 L
won head-to-head
06
M/S JEET ENTERPRISES0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedPrajna Group awardedOthers

About Prajna Group

Prajna Group appears as a bidder on 23 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 23 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 13.0% win rate — worth ₹79.5 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 10 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Nagpur Municipal Corporation Nagpur, at 86.4% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 14.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against MRV Construction, Akhil Shivkumar Atulkar and gaurav. MRV Construction bid on 9 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; Prajna Group won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.