Competitor profile

MRV Construction

They win 26% of what they bid, and 25% of the value they chase.

31tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
6 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
31
31 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
8
17 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹9.6 Cr
of ₹38.1 Cr bid — 25.2% conversion
Win rate
25.8%
of 31 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count31 bids
25.8%
19.4%
54.8%
Awarded825.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected619.4%
Lost1754.8%
By value₹38.1 Cr
25.2%
30.7%
44.1%
Awarded₹9.6 Cr25.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹11.7 Cr30.7%
Lost₹16.8 Cr44.1%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Public Works Region₹9.6 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹9.6 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Prajna Group1 win · 9 shared tenders
₹10.9 L
won head-to-head
02
Akhil Shivkumar Atulkar0 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
RAJIV MANIKCHAND BHANGE3 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹34.5 L
won head-to-head
04
Bipin s Bansod3 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹2.0 Cr
won head-to-head
05
Gupta Construction0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Sejal Fattulal Kanoje1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹10.9 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMRV Construction awardedOthers

About MRV Construction

MRV Construction appears as a bidder on 31 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 31 decided bids, it was awarded 8 — a 25.8% win rate — worth ₹9.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 6 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Public Works Region, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 17.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Prajna Group, Akhil Shivkumar Atulkar and RAJIV MANIKCHAND BHANGE. Prajna Group bid on 9 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; MRV Construction won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.