Competitor profile

PRAFUL GUPTA-KRISHAN MURARI GUPTA AND SON

They win 13% of what they bid, and 13% of the value they chase.

8tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
4 Sept 2013last award
Total bids
8
8 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
7 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹50.0 L
of ₹3.9 Cr bid — 12.7% conversion
Win rate
12.5%
of 8 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count8 bids
12.5%
87.5%
Awarded112.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost787.5%
By value₹3.9 Cr
12.7%
87.3%
Awarded₹50.0 L12.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹3.4 Cr87.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Delhi₹50.0 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
₹32.1 L
won head-to-head
02
Rajesh Kapoor-M K Signs6 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹2.9 Cr
won head-to-head
03
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Narinder Mahajan-VIBGYOR INDUSTRIES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Pramod Jain0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedPRAFUL GUPTA-KRISHAN awardedOthers

About PRAFUL GUPTA-KRISHAN MURARI GUPTA AND SON

PRAFUL GUPTA-KRISHAN MURARI GUPTA AND SON appears as a bidder on 8 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 8 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 12.5% win rate — worth ₹50.0 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 4 Sept 2013.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Public Works Department, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Delhi. On priced bids, its median quote is 4.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Ravinder Nath Hassija-CBM INDUSTRIE LIMITED, Rajesh Kapoor-M K Signs and Anil Kumar Bhutani-Anil Engieering Works. Ravinder Nath Hassija-CBM INDUSTRIE LIMITED bid on 7 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; PRAFUL GUPTA-KRISHAN MURARI GUPTA AND SON won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.