Competitor profile

Parmatma Enterprises

They win 11% of what they bid, and 10% of the value they chase.

175tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
5 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
143
175 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
16
118 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹6.8 Cr
of ₹66.4 Cr bid — 10.2% conversion
Win rate
11.2%
of 143 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count143 bids
11.2%
82.5%
Awarded1611.2%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected96.3%
Lost11882.5%
By value₹66.4 Cr
10.2%
21.2%
68.6%
Awarded₹6.8 Cr10.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹14.1 Cr21.2%
Lost₹45.5 Cr68.6%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

16 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s Shree Construction Co9 wins · 69 shared tenders
₹3.9 Cr
won head-to-head
02
M/s Mukesh Engineers3 wins · 62 shared tenders
₹1.2 Cr
won head-to-head
03
M/S KHUSHI ENTERPRISES8 wins · 56 shared tenders
₹2.6 Cr
won head-to-head
04
mp construction co10 wins · 54 shared tenders
₹3.9 Cr
won head-to-head
05
PRIME ENGINEERS0 wins · 48 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
A M ENTERPRISES7 wins · 45 shared tenders
₹2.0 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedParmatma Enterprises awardedOthers

About Parmatma Enterprises

Parmatma Enterprises appears as a bidder on 175 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 143 decided bids, it was awarded 16 — a 11.2% win rate — worth ₹6.8 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 5 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 11.7% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/s Shree Construction Co, M/s Mukesh Engineers and M/S KHUSHI ENTERPRISES. M/s Shree Construction Co bid on 69 of the same tenders and won 9 of them; Parmatma Enterprises won 5.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.