Competitor profile

A M ENTERPRISES

They win 23% of what they bid, and 20% of the value they chase.

122tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
29 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
109
122 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
25
75 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4.5 Cr
of ₹22.4 Cr bid — 20.1% conversion
Win rate
22.9%
of 109 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count109 bids
22.9%
68.8%
Awarded2522.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected98.3%
Lost7568.8%
By value₹22.4 Cr
20.1%
75.0%
Awarded₹4.5 Cr20.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.1 Cr4.8%
Lost₹16.8 Cr75.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

25 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Parmatma Enterprises2 wins · 45 shared tenders
₹85.4 L
won head-to-head
02
M/s Shree Construction Co4 wins · 33 shared tenders
₹1.1 Cr
won head-to-head
03
mp construction co1 win · 29 shared tenders
₹35.8 L
won head-to-head
04
M/S KHUSHI ENTERPRISES2 wins · 29 shared tenders
₹58.0 L
won head-to-head
05
PRIME ENGINEERS0 wins · 24 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/s Mukesh Engineers1 win · 24 shared tenders
₹28.2 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedA M ENTERPRISES awardedOthers

About A M ENTERPRISES

A M ENTERPRISES appears as a bidder on 122 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 109 decided bids, it was awarded 25 — a 22.9% win rate — worth ₹4.5 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 29 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 10.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Parmatma Enterprises, M/s Shree Construction Co and mp construction co. Parmatma Enterprises bid on 45 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; A M ENTERPRISES won 7.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.