Competitor profile

mp construction co

They win 26% of what they bid, and 24% of the value they chase.

109tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
5 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
90
109 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
23
67 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹8.2 Cr
of ₹34.8 Cr bid — 23.6% conversion
Win rate
25.6%
of 90 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count90 bids
25.6%
74.4%
Awarded2325.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost6774.4%
By value₹34.8 Cr
23.6%
76.4%
Awarded₹8.2 Cr23.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹26.6 Cr76.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

23 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Parmatma Enterprises6 wins · 54 shared tenders
₹2.8 Cr
won head-to-head
02
M/s Mukesh Engineers7 wins · 40 shared tenders
₹1.8 Cr
won head-to-head
03
Vishal Builders5 wins · 40 shared tenders
₹1.8 Cr
won head-to-head
04
M/s Shree Construction Co3 wins · 32 shared tenders
₹2.1 Cr
won head-to-head
05
A M ENTERPRISES4 wins · 29 shared tenders
₹1.1 Cr
won head-to-head
06
PRIME ENGINEERS0 wins · 24 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedmp construction awardedOthers

About mp construction co

mp construction co appears as a bidder on 109 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 90 decided bids, it was awarded 23 — a 25.6% win rate — worth ₹8.2 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 5 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 6.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Parmatma Enterprises, M/s Mukesh Engineers and Vishal Builders. Parmatma Enterprises bid on 54 of the same tenders and won 6 of them; mp construction co won 10.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.