Competitor profile

Padmaja Electricals

They win 47% of what they bid, and 44% of the value they chase.

43tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
5 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
43
43 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
20
23 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹13.2 Cr
of ₹30.0 Cr bid — 44.0% conversion
Win rate
46.5%
of 43 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count43 bids
46.5%
53.5%
Awarded2046.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost2353.5%
By value₹30.0 Cr
44.0%
56.0%
Awarded₹13.2 Cr44.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹16.8 Cr56.0%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹13.2 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Ms. Nikhil Electro Mechanicals1 win · 8 shared tenders
₹32.8 L
won head-to-head
02
Purvith Enterprises3 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹19.0 L
won head-to-head
03
Om Samarth Electricals1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹1.8 Cr
won head-to-head
04
Kanishka Enterprises3 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹26.8 L
won head-to-head
05
Standard Electrotech Services1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹1.2 Cr
won head-to-head
06
J.J.ELECTRIC2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹9.4 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedPadmaja Electricals awardedOthers

About Padmaja Electricals

Padmaja Electricals appears as a bidder on 43 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 43 decided bids, it was awarded 20 — a 46.5% win rate — worth ₹13.2 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 5 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority, at 67.6% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Ms. Nikhil Electro Mechanicals, Purvith Enterprises and Om Samarth Electricals. Ms. Nikhil Electro Mechanicals bid on 8 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; Padmaja Electricals won 5.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.