Competitor profile

NILESH KAILAS WAGHMARE

They win 25% of what they bid — and 48% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

5tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
24 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
4
5 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.2 Cr
of ₹2.5 Cr bid — 47.6% conversion
Win rate
25.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count4 bids
25.0%
25.0%
50.0%
Awarded125.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected125.0%
Lost250.0%
By value₹2.5 Cr
47.6%
48.1%
Awarded₹1.2 Cr47.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹11.0 L4.4%
Lost₹1.2 Cr48.1%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹1.2 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
HANMANT BHIWA GALAVE2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹1.2 Cr
won head-to-head
02
Atul bele0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
PRAMOD TUKARAM KHILARE0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
santosh sukhadeo borude0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Shri Pankaj Tanaji Nalawade0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
JOTIRAM SHIVAJI SARGAR0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNILESH KAILAS awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to NILESH KAILAS

About NILESH KAILAS WAGHMARE

NILESH KAILAS WAGHMARE appears as a bidder on 5 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 25.0% win rate — worth ₹1.2 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 24 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Tourism and Cultural Affairs Dept. Maharashtra, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against HANMANT BHIWA GALAVE, Atul bele and PRAMOD TUKARAM KHILARE. HANMANT BHIWA GALAVE bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; NILESH KAILAS WAGHMARE won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.