Competitor profile

NATCO PHARMA LIMITED

They win 75% of what they bid, but only 0.3% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

6tenders on record
4buyer authorities
3states
3 Feb 2026last award
Total bids
4
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹29.9 L
of ₹88.1 Cr bid — 0.3% conversion
Win rate
75.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count4 bids
75.0%
25.0%
Awarded375.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected125.0%
Lost00.0%
By value₹88.1 Cr
99.7%
Awarded₹29.9 L0.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹87.8 Cr99.7%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

2 authorities · 2 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Tripura₹29.9 L
Assam₹4,257

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Cipla Ltd2 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹2.8 Cr
won head-to-head
02
ABBOTT INDIA LIMITED4 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹4.2 Cr
won head-to-head
03
Dr Reddys laboratories Limited3 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹7.0 Cr
won head-to-head
04
Cadila Pharmaceuticals Limited3 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹2.8 Cr
won head-to-head
05
Reliance Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd3 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹2.2 Cr
won head-to-head
06
UNICURE INDIA LTD4 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹15.6 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNATCO PHARMA awardedOthers

About NATCO PHARMA LIMITED

NATCO PHARMA LIMITED appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 3 states. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 75.0% win rate — worth ₹29.9 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 3 Feb 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Secretary Health and Family Welfare Department, at 99.9% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Tripura and Assam. On priced bids, its median quote is 166.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Cipla Ltd, ABBOTT INDIA LIMITED and Dr Reddys laboratories Limited. Cipla Ltd bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; NATCO PHARMA LIMITED won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.