Competitor profile

NARESH GUPTA-KUMAR ELECTRIC WORKS

They win 1% of what they bid, and 1% of the value they chase.

78tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
15 Sept 2014last award
Total bids
78
78 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
12 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.0 L
of ₹2.8 Cr bid — 0.7% conversion
Win rate
1.3%
of 78 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count78 bids
83.3%
15.4%
Awarded11.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected6583.3%
Lost1215.4%
By value₹2.8 Cr
80.0%
19.3%
Awarded₹2.0 L0.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.3 Cr80.0%
Lost₹54.4 L19.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Delhi₹2.0 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Vivek Associates-Vivek Associates2 wins · 63 shared tenders
₹4.8 L
won head-to-head
02
Ishwar Singh -Saini Brothers0 wins · 56 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
₹9.1 L
won head-to-head
04
₹0
won head-to-head
05
SATISH SAINI -ASHUTOSH ELECTRIC CO .0 wins · 53 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Ratan Lal0 wins · 52 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNARESH GUPTA-KUMAR awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to NARESH GUPTA-KUMAR

About NARESH GUPTA-KUMAR ELECTRIC WORKS

NARESH GUPTA-KUMAR ELECTRIC WORKS appears as a bidder on 78 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 78 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 1.3% win rate — worth ₹2.0 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 15 Sept 2014.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Public Works Department, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Delhi. On priced bids, its median quote is 19.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Vivek Associates-Vivek Associates, Ishwar Singh -Saini Brothers and Mohd Zohair Khan-Classic Refrigeration Works. Vivek Associates-Vivek Associates bid on 63 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; NARESH GUPTA-KUMAR ELECTRIC WORKS won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.