Competitor profile

NARENDER SINGH GULERIA

They win 33% of what they bid, and 26% of the value they chase.

15tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
2 May 2026last award
Total bids
15
15 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
7 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹43.8 L
of ₹1.7 Cr bid — 26.4% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 15 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count15 bids
33.3%
20.0%
46.7%
Awarded533.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected320.0%
Lost746.7%
By value₹1.7 Cr
26.4%
70.6%
Awarded₹43.8 L26.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹5.0 L3.0%
Lost₹1.2 Cr70.6%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

PWD₹35.3 L80.6%

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SHARMA ELECTRICAL CO.3 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹56.8 L
won head-to-head
02
KUMAR ELECTRONICS CO.2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹35.3 L
won head-to-head
03
Kalra Hardware and Electric Store0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
MANOJ KUMAR BANSAL0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Kumar Enterprises0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/S G.S ELECTRICAL WORKS3 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹4.9 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNARENDER SINGH awardedOthers

About NARENDER SINGH GULERIA

NARENDER SINGH GULERIA appears as a bidder on 15 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 15 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹43.8 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 2 May 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PWD, at 80.6% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Himachal Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SHARMA ELECTRICAL CO., KUMAR ELECTRONICS CO. and Kalra Hardware and Electric Store. SHARMA ELECTRICAL CO. bid on 6 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; NARENDER SINGH GULERIA won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.