Competitor profile

MS NAMO PHARMA

They win 33% of what they bid — and 98% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

3tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
5 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
3
3 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹8,800
of ₹8,992 bid — 97.9% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 3 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count3 bids
33.3%
66.7%
Awarded133.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost266.7%
By value₹8,992
97.9%
Awarded₹8,80097.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹1922.1%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Pune Municipal Corporation₹8,800100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹8,800

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
AUSTIN HEALTH CARE0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
VARDHAN DISTRIBUTORS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
D.VIJAY PHARMA PVT LTD0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Supreme Technocare Pvt Ltd0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
TRIMURTI AGENCIES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Rajesh Pharma0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMS NAMO PHARMA awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to MS NAMO PHARMA

About MS NAMO PHARMA

MS NAMO PHARMA appears as a bidder on 3 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 3 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹8,800 in total. Its most recent award on record is from 5 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Pune Municipal Corporation, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against AUSTIN HEALTH CARE, VARDHAN DISTRIBUTORS and D.VIJAY PHARMA PVT LTD. AUSTIN HEALTH CARE bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; MS NAMO PHARMA won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.