Competitor profile

AUSTIN HEALTH CARE

They win 43% of what they bid, and 34% of the value they chase.

23tenders on record
11buyer authorities
1state
3 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
23
23 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
10
8 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹5.0 Cr
of ₹14.6 Cr bid — 34.4% conversion
Win rate
43.5%
of 23 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count23 bids
43.5%
21.7%
34.8%
Awarded1043.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected521.7%
Lost834.8%
By value₹14.6 Cr
34.4%
55.9%
Awarded₹5.0 Cr34.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹8.2 Cr55.9%
Lost₹1.4 Cr9.7%

Where they win

6 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

RDD-CEO-SATARA₹1.1 Cr21.0%
RDD-CEO-KOLHAPUR₹56.6 L11.2%

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹5.0 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
VARDHAN DISTRIBUTORS5 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹1.6 Cr
won head-to-head
02
Keps Pharma4 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹77.9 L
won head-to-head
03
Jainam Pharma (India) Pvt. Ltd.5 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹1.1 Cr
won head-to-head
04
GAGAN PHARMA3 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹2.5 Cr
won head-to-head
05
genova biotec3 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹72.3 L
won head-to-head
06
Chandak Medical Stores6 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹48.6 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAUSTIN HEALTH awardedOthers

About AUSTIN HEALTH CARE

AUSTIN HEALTH CARE appears as a bidder on 23 government tenders on record, from 11 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 23 decided bids, it was awarded 10 — a 43.5% win rate — worth ₹5.0 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 3 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation, at 52.1% of what it has won, out of 6 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against VARDHAN DISTRIBUTORS, Keps Pharma and Jainam Pharma (India) Pvt. Ltd.. VARDHAN DISTRIBUTORS bid on 11 of the same tenders and won 5 of them; AUSTIN HEALTH CARE won 7.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.