Competitor profile

MS ATHARVA CONSTRUCTION

They win 39% of what they bid, and 47% of the value they chase.

18tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
9 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
18
18 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
7
9 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.6 Cr
of ₹3.5 Cr bid — 47.5% conversion
Win rate
38.9%
of 18 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count18 bids
38.9%
11.1%
50.0%
Awarded738.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected211.1%
Lost950.0%
By value₹3.5 Cr
47.5%
32.4%
20.2%
Awarded₹1.6 Cr47.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.1 Cr32.4%
Lost₹69.9 L20.2%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Public Works Region₹1.5 Cr91.2%

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹1.6 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S Akanksha Construction0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
M M GHAG0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Kakad Engineers and Contractor0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
H.S.construction1 win · 6 shared tenders
₹1
won head-to-head
05
Yogita Enterprises1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹1
won head-to-head
06
ECESIS INFRAPROJECTS2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹2
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMS ATHARVA awardedOthers

About MS ATHARVA CONSTRUCTION

MS ATHARVA CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 18 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 18 decided bids, it was awarded 7 — a 38.9% win rate — worth ₹1.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 9 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Public Works Region, at 91.2% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 11.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S Akanksha Construction, M M GHAG and Kakad Engineers and Contractor. M/S Akanksha Construction bid on 8 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; MS ATHARVA CONSTRUCTION won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.