Competitor profile

M M GHAG

They win 9% of what they bid, and 8% of the value they chase.

80tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
2 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
79
80 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
7
23 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.8 Cr
of ₹22.9 Cr bid — 8.1% conversion
Win rate
8.9%
of 79 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count79 bids
62.0%
29.1%
Awarded78.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected4962.0%
Lost2329.1%
By value₹22.9 Cr
68.4%
23.6%
Awarded₹1.8 Cr8.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹15.6 Cr68.4%
Lost₹5.4 Cr23.6%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Public Works Region₹1.7 Cr91.6%

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹1.8 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Yogita Enterprises2 wins · 18 shared tenders
₹17.0 L
won head-to-head
02
H.S.construction2 wins · 15 shared tenders
₹33.9 L
won head-to-head
03
Kakad Engineers and Contractor1 win · 12 shared tenders
₹50.7 L
won head-to-head
04
Akash Rajendra Gite0 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Lotus Enterprises0 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
mangesh chandrakant vetkar1 win · 10 shared tenders
₹24.4 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedM M GHAG awardedOthers

About M M GHAG

M M GHAG appears as a bidder on 80 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 79 decided bids, it was awarded 7 — a 8.9% win rate — worth ₹1.8 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 2 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Public Works Region, at 91.6% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 16.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Yogita Enterprises, H.S.construction and Kakad Engineers and Contractor. Yogita Enterprises bid on 18 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; M M GHAG won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.