Competitor profile

MS AJ ENTERPRISE

They win 33% of what they bid, but only 21% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

3tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
23 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
3
3 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.2 L
of ₹5.7 L bid — 21.1% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 3 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count3 bids
33.3%
66.7%
Awarded133.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected266.7%
Lost00.0%
By value₹5.7 L
21.1%
78.9%
Awarded₹1.2 L21.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹4.5 L78.9%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Zilla Parishad₹1.2 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
West Bengal₹1.2 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S MALLICK CONTRUCTION0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
KALYANI ENTERPRISE0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
KAYAM ENTRPRISE2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹4.5 L
won head-to-head
04
DHANAPATI MONDAL0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
FAMOUS TRADERS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
SWAMIJI ENTERPRISE0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMS AJ ENTERPRISE awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to MS AJ ENTERPRISE

About MS AJ ENTERPRISE

MS AJ ENTERPRISE appears as a bidder on 3 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 3 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹1.2 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 23 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Zilla Parishad, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from West Bengal. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against M/S MALLICK CONTRUCTION, KALYANI ENTERPRISE and KAYAM ENTRPRISE. M/S MALLICK CONTRUCTION bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; MS AJ ENTERPRISE won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.