Competitor profile

M/S. MD LATIPH

They win 25% of what they bid, and 29% of the value they chase.

4tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
11 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
4
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹8.8 L
of ₹30.1 L bid — 29.2% conversion
Win rate
25.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count4 bids
25.0%
25.0%
50.0%
Awarded125.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected125.0%
Lost250.0%
By value₹30.1 L
29.2%
17.8%
53.0%
Awarded₹8.8 L29.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹5.4 L17.8%
Lost₹16.0 L53.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Zilla Parishad₹8.8 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
West Bengal₹8.8 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
HIMGSHU DEY2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹15.4 L
won head-to-head
02
PAYEL ENTERPRISE0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
NIRBHOY SINGH RATHOR1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹5.9 L
won head-to-head
04
ANIL BARMAN0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/S IS ENTERPRISE0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
PRAKASH KUMAR AGARWAL0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMD LATIPH awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to MD LATIPH

About M/S. MD LATIPH

M/S. MD LATIPH appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 25.0% win rate — worth ₹8.8 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 11 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Zilla Parishad, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from West Bengal. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against HIMGSHU DEY, PAYEL ENTERPRISE and NIRBHOY SINGH RATHOR. HIMGSHU DEY bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; M/S. MD LATIPH won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.