Competitor profile

M S ENTERPRISES

They win 35% of what they bid, and 29% of the value they chase.

104tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
17 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
103
104 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
36
64 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4.2 Cr
of ₹14.3 Cr bid — 29.5% conversion
Win rate
35.0%
of 103 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count103 bids
35.0%
62.1%
Awarded3635.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected32.9%
Lost6462.1%
By value₹14.3 Cr
29.5%
63.9%
Awarded₹4.2 Cr29.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹95.3 L6.7%
Lost₹9.1 Cr63.9%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Punjab₹4.2 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M. M. INTERNATIONAL1 win · 40 shared tenders
₹2.2 L
won head-to-head
02
JAI DURGA ELECTRICALS19 wins · 40 shared tenders
₹1.5 Cr
won head-to-head
03
Tanvi Enterprises13 wins · 27 shared tenders
₹1.3 Cr
won head-to-head
04
subhash and sons11 wins · 26 shared tenders
₹3.0 Cr
won head-to-head
05
JAGMOHAN DEEP BANSAL CONTRACTOR2 wins · 17 shared tenders
₹4.8 L
won head-to-head
06
Vivek Enterprises4 wins · 17 shared tenders
₹22.6 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedM S ENTERPRISES awardedOthers

About M S ENTERPRISES

M S ENTERPRISES appears as a bidder on 104 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 103 decided bids, it was awarded 36 — a 35.0% win rate — worth ₹4.2 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 17 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Department of Local Government, at 96.3% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Punjab. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M. M. INTERNATIONAL, JAI DURGA ELECTRICALS and Tanvi Enterprises. M. M. INTERNATIONAL bid on 40 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; M S ENTERPRISES won 14.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.