Competitor profile

Lotus construction Co.

They win 32% of what they bid, and 38% of the value they chase.

164tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
14 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
164
164 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
52
85 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹5.3 Cr
of ₹14.2 Cr bid — 37.6% conversion
Win rate
31.7%
of 164 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count164 bids
31.7%
16.5%
51.8%
Awarded5231.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected2716.5%
Lost8551.8%
By value₹14.2 Cr
37.6%
19.5%
42.9%
Awarded₹5.3 Cr37.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.8 Cr19.5%
Lost₹6.1 Cr42.9%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Panjab University₹1.4 Cr26.0%
Municipal Corporation₹98.4 L18.4%

Operating states

LowHigh
Chandigarh₹5.3 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Eco Plantation9 wins · 72 shared tenders
₹94.9 L
won head-to-head
02
CHHOTE LAL PLANTATION7 wins · 43 shared tenders
₹25.3 L
won head-to-head
03
MODERN LANDSCAPING SERVICES19 wins · 39 shared tenders
₹1.2 Cr
won head-to-head
04
KAKA RAM10 wins · 32 shared tenders
₹1.0 Cr
won head-to-head
05
DAVINDER SINGH MINHAS8 wins · 27 shared tenders
₹62.6 L
won head-to-head
06
R.R. Enterprises12 wins · 25 shared tenders
₹51.3 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedLotus construction awardedOthers

About Lotus construction Co.

Lotus construction Co. appears as a bidder on 164 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 164 decided bids, it was awarded 52 — a 31.7% win rate — worth ₹5.3 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 14 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Chandigarh Administration, at 55.6% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Chandigarh. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Eco Plantation, CHHOTE LAL PLANTATION and MODERN LANDSCAPING SERVICES. Eco Plantation bid on 72 of the same tenders and won 9 of them; Lotus construction Co. won 28.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.