Competitor profile

Eco Plantation

They win 14% of what they bid, and 15% of the value they chase.

219tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
18 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
218
219 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
31
174 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.9 Cr
of ₹26.1 Cr bid — 14.8% conversion
Win rate
14.2%
of 218 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count218 bids
14.2%
79.8%
Awarded3114.2%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected136.0%
Lost17479.8%
By value₹26.1 Cr
14.9%
76.8%
Awarded₹3.9 Cr14.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.2 Cr8.3%
Lost₹20.1 Cr76.8%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Municipal Corporation₹44.9 L11.6%
Panjab University₹3.5 L0.9%

Operating states

LowHigh
Chandigarh₹3.9 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Lotus construction Co.28 wins · 72 shared tenders
₹3.2 Cr
won head-to-head
02
MODERN LANDSCAPING SERVICES46 wins · 66 shared tenders
₹5.0 Cr
won head-to-head
03
KAKA RAM10 wins · 38 shared tenders
₹1.9 Cr
won head-to-head
04
₹46.8 L
won head-to-head
05
M/S PARDEEP KUMAR11 wins · 36 shared tenders
₹1.9 Cr
won head-to-head
06
DAVINDER SINGH MINHAS16 wins · 34 shared tenders
₹90.2 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedEco Plantation awardedOthers

About Eco Plantation

Eco Plantation appears as a bidder on 219 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 218 decided bids, it was awarded 31 — a 14.2% win rate — worth ₹3.9 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 18 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Chandigarh Administration, at 87.5% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Chandigarh. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Lotus construction Co., MODERN LANDSCAPING SERVICES and KAKA RAM. Lotus construction Co. bid on 72 of the same tenders and won 28 of them; Eco Plantation won 9.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.