Competitor profile

KIRTI ENTERPRISES

They win 67% of what they bid, and 73% of the value they chase.

64tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
7 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
64
64 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
43
15 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.4 Cr
of ₹1.9 Cr bid — 72.7% conversion
Win rate
67.2%
of 64 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count64 bids
67.2%
23.4%
Awarded4367.2%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected69.4%
Lost1523.4%
By value₹1.9 Cr
72.7%
21.7%
Awarded₹1.4 Cr72.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹11.0 L5.7%
Lost₹42.0 L21.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Punjab₹1.4 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M. M. INTERNATIONAL4 wins · 35 shared tenders
₹9.8 L
won head-to-head
02
V. P. ENTERPRISES0 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
JAIN AGENCIES2 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹1.6 L
won head-to-head
04
avtarsingh4 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹6.9 L
won head-to-head
05
YASHODHRA METALS1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹2.5 L
won head-to-head
06
TARVINDER PAL SINGH CONTRACTOR1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹2.1 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKIRTI ENTERPRISES awardedOthers

About KIRTI ENTERPRISES

KIRTI ENTERPRISES appears as a bidder on 64 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 64 decided bids, it was awarded 43 — a 67.2% win rate — worth ₹1.4 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 7 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Department of Local Government, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Punjab. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against M. M. INTERNATIONAL, V. P. ENTERPRISES and JAIN AGENCIES. M. M. INTERNATIONAL bid on 35 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; KIRTI ENTERPRISES won 24.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.