Competitor profile

M/s. KHATRI MOHAMMED FAROOQUE GULAM NABI

They win 17% of what they bid, but only 0% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

6tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
3 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1
of ₹1.3 Cr bid — 0.0% conversion
Win rate
16.7%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count6 bids
16.7%
50.0%
33.3%
Awarded116.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected350.0%
Lost233.3%
By value₹1.3 Cr
100.0%
Awarded₹10.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.3 Cr100.0%
Lost₹60.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
CITYSCAPE ENGINEERS0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Yogita Enterprises0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Kakad Engineers and Contractor0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M M GHAG0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
D.T.Jangam1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹1
won head-to-head
06
AKBAR MAKSUD AHMED SHAIKH1 win · 1 shared tender
₹1
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKHATRI MOHAMMED awardedOthers

About M/s. KHATRI MOHAMMED FAROOQUE GULAM NABI

M/s. KHATRI MOHAMMED FAROOQUE GULAM NABI appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 16.7% win rate — worth ₹1 in total. Its most recent award on record is from 3 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Public Works Region, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 200.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against CITYSCAPE ENGINEERS, Yogita Enterprises and Kakad Engineers and Contractor. CITYSCAPE ENGINEERS bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; M/s. KHATRI MOHAMMED FAROOQUE GULAM NABI won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.