Competitor profile

KHAIRUL ISLAM

They win 50% of what they bid, but only 0% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

16tenders on record
6buyer authorities
1state
19 Dec 2025last award
Total bids
16
16 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
8
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹8
of ₹2.3 Cr bid — 0.0% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 16 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count16 bids
50.0%
31.3%
18.8%
Awarded850.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected531.3%
Lost318.8%
By value₹2.3 Cr
65.0%
35.0%
Awarded₹80.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.5 Cr65.0%
Lost₹81.6 L35.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Assam₹8

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
MATIUR RAHMAN7 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹12
won head-to-head
02
Power Tools and Engineering8 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹8
won head-to-head
03
SAIFUL ISLAM8 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹16
won head-to-head
04
B K ENTERPRISE7 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹7
won head-to-head
05
shoiab khan7 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹7
won head-to-head
06
KRISHNA ENGINEERINGS7 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹7
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKHAIRUL ISLAM awardedOthers

About KHAIRUL ISLAM

KHAIRUL ISLAM appears as a bidder on 16 government tenders on record, from 6 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 16 decided bids, it was awarded 8 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹8 in total. Its most recent award on record is from 19 Dec 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Public Health Engineering Department, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Assam. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against MATIUR RAHMAN, Power Tools and Engineering and SAIFUL ISLAM. MATIUR RAHMAN bid on 8 of the same tenders and won 7 of them; KHAIRUL ISLAM won 7.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.