Competitor profile

Matiur Rahman

They win 37% of what they bid, and 28% of the value they chase.

92tenders on record
8buyer authorities
1state
10 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
92
92 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
34
31 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹13.1 Cr
of ₹47.0 Cr bid — 28.0% conversion
Win rate
37.0%
of 92 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count92 bids
37.0%
29.3%
33.7%
Awarded3437.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected2729.3%
Lost3133.7%
By value₹47.0 Cr
28.0%
33.1%
38.9%
Awarded₹13.1 Cr28.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹15.5 Cr33.1%
Lost₹18.3 Cr38.9%

Where they win

6 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Assam₹13.1 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Power Tools and Engineering12 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹12
won head-to-head
02
SAIFUL ISLAM11 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹24
won head-to-head
03
ROFIQUL ISLAM11 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹25
won head-to-head
04
KRISHNA ENGINEERINGS10 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹10
won head-to-head
05
KAMAL DAS5 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹7
won head-to-head
06
BRAHMAPUTRA COMMERCE AND TRADE10 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹10
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMatiur Rahman awardedOthers

About Matiur Rahman

Matiur Rahman appears as a bidder on 92 government tenders on record, from 8 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 92 decided bids, it was awarded 34 — a 37.0% win rate — worth ₹13.1 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 10 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Public Works Roads Department, at 75.2% of what it has won, out of 6 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Assam. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Power Tools and Engineering, SAIFUL ISLAM and ROFIQUL ISLAM. Power Tools and Engineering bid on 12 of the same tenders and won 12 of them; Matiur Rahman won 12.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.