Competitor profile

J M Construction

They win 10% of what they bid, and 14% of the value they chase.

11tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
16 Mar 2023last award
Total bids
10
11 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹39.8 L
of ₹2.8 Cr bid — 14.2% conversion
Win rate
10.0%
of 10 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count10 bids
10.0%
50.0%
40.0%
Awarded110.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected550.0%
Lost440.0%
By value₹2.8 Cr
14.2%
42.3%
43.5%
Awarded₹39.8 L14.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.2 Cr42.3%
Lost₹1.2 Cr43.5%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Delhi₹39.8 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S AMIT ENTERPRISES0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
M/S NAND KISHORE YADAV0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
ADITYA ENTERPRISES1 win · 7 shared tenders
₹22.3 L
won head-to-head
04
M/S Bhawani Constructions0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/S Jagdamba Enterprises1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹34.7 L
won head-to-head
06
Kulwant Singh0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedJ M Construction awardedOthers

About J M Construction

J M Construction appears as a bidder on 11 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 10 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 10.0% win rate — worth ₹39.8 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 16 Mar 2023.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Public Works Department, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Delhi. On priced bids, its median quote is 21.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S AMIT ENTERPRISES, M/S NAND KISHORE YADAV and ADITYA ENTERPRISES. M/S AMIT ENTERPRISES bid on 8 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; J M Construction won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.