Competitor profile

IRSHAD AHMED

They win 75% of what they bid — and 96% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

4tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
17 Mar 2025last award
Total bids
4
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹31.4 L
of ₹32.8 L bid — 95.9% conversion
Win rate
75.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count4 bids
75.0%
25.0%
Awarded375.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected125.0%
Lost00.0%
By value₹32.8 L
95.9%
Awarded₹31.4 L95.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.3 L4.1%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
ELEGANT CONSTRUCTIONS3 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹29.4 L
won head-to-head
02
M/S HILAL AHMAD SHAH2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹15.2 L
won head-to-head
03
Ghulam Rasool0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
RAJ SINGH1 win · 1 shared tender
₹1.3 L
won head-to-head
05
M/S NISAR AND CO.1 win · 1 shared tender
₹10.0 L
won head-to-head
06
M/S AHANGER ENGINEERING WORKS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedIRSHAD AHMED awardedOthers

About IRSHAD AHMED

IRSHAD AHMED appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 75.0% win rate — worth ₹31.4 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 17 Mar 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Horticulture Production Deptt, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Jammu And Kashmir. On priced bids, its median quote is 30.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against ELEGANT CONSTRUCTIONS, M/S HILAL AHMAD SHAH and Ghulam Rasool. ELEGANT CONSTRUCTIONS bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; IRSHAD AHMED won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.