Competitor profile

ELEGANT CONSTRUCTIONS

They win 57% of what they bid, but only 8% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

7tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
15 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
7
7 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹45.4 L
of ₹5.4 Cr bid — 8.4% conversion
Win rate
57.1%
of 7 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count7 bids
57.1%
42.9%
Awarded457.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost342.9%
By value₹5.4 Cr
91.6%
Awarded₹45.4 L8.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹5.0 Cr91.6%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S HILAL AHMAD SHAH3 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹29.4 L
won head-to-head
02
IRSHAD AHMED3 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹31.4 L
won head-to-head
03
M/S NISAR AND CO.2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹27.4 L
won head-to-head
04
TECHMINANCE SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
SMA POWER CONTROL PVT LTD2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹76.6 L
won head-to-head
06
M/S AHANGER ENGINEERING WORKS1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹14.5 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedELEGANT CONSTRUCTIONS awardedOthers

About ELEGANT CONSTRUCTIONS

ELEGANT CONSTRUCTIONS appears as a bidder on 7 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 7 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 57.1% win rate — worth ₹45.4 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 15 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Horticulture Production Deptt, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Jammu And Kashmir. On priced bids, its median quote is 12.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S HILAL AHMAD SHAH, IRSHAD AHMED and M/S NISAR AND CO.. M/S HILAL AHMAD SHAH bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; ELEGANT CONSTRUCTIONS won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.