Competitor profile

M/S NISAR AND CO.

They win 40% of what they bid, and 37% of the value they chase.

34tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
14 Feb 2023last award
Total bids
35
34 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
14
19 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.0 Cr
of ₹8.1 Cr bid — 37.3% conversion
Win rate
40.0%
of 35 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count35 bids
40.0%
54.3%
Awarded1440.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected25.7%
Lost1954.3%
By value₹8.1 Cr
37.3%
54.8%
Awarded₹3.0 Cr37.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹64.1 L7.9%
Lost₹4.4 Cr54.8%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

University Department₹48.0 L15.2%

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S RAVINDER KUMAR CONTRACTOR1 win · 7 shared tenders
₹1.3 L
won head-to-head
02
M/S KAMA DEV SAMAL0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M/S ZARGAR CONSTRUCTIONS3 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹1.3 Cr
won head-to-head
04
M/s Abdul Rehman0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
MR.SHAHID MAJEED AKHOON1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹65.0 L
won head-to-head
06
RAFIQ AHMAD CHACHOO0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNISAR AND CO. awardedOthers

About M/S NISAR AND CO.

M/S NISAR AND CO. appears as a bidder on 34 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 35 decided bids, it was awarded 14 — a 40.0% win rate — worth ₹3.0 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 14 Feb 2023.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Horticulture Production Deptt, at 84.8% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Jammu And Kashmir. On priced bids, its median quote is 6.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S RAVINDER KUMAR CONTRACTOR, M/S KAMA DEV SAMAL and M/S ZARGAR CONSTRUCTIONS. M/S RAVINDER KUMAR CONTRACTOR bid on 7 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; M/S NISAR AND CO. won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.