Competitor profile

M/S HIMANSHU BUILDERS

They win 17% of what they bid, and 15% of the value they chase.

115tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
18 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
108
115 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
18
85 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4.8 Cr
of ₹32.3 Cr bid — 14.7% conversion
Win rate
16.7%
of 108 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count108 bids
16.7%
78.7%
Awarded1816.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected54.6%
Lost8578.7%
By value₹32.3 Cr
14.7%
78.3%
Awarded₹4.8 Cr14.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.2 Cr7.0%
Lost₹25.3 Cr78.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

18 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
satpal and brothers12 wins · 30 shared tenders
₹2.2 Cr
won head-to-head
02
M/S NARESH KUMAR SHARMA3 wins · 24 shared tenders
₹99.1 L
won head-to-head
03
RD Engineers1 win · 21 shared tenders
₹43.7 L
won head-to-head
04
M/S GULATI ENGINEERING WORKS6 wins · 19 shared tenders
₹1.8 Cr
won head-to-head
05
M/S DUGGAL CONSTRUCTION CO5 wins · 18 shared tenders
₹1.8 Cr
won head-to-head
06
WALIA ENTERPRISES1 win · 15 shared tenders
₹33.1 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedHIMANSHU BUILDERS awardedOthers

About M/S HIMANSHU BUILDERS

M/S HIMANSHU BUILDERS appears as a bidder on 115 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 108 decided bids, it was awarded 18 — a 16.7% win rate — worth ₹4.8 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 18 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 11.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against satpal and brothers, M/S NARESH KUMAR SHARMA and RD Engineers. satpal and brothers bid on 30 of the same tenders and won 12 of them; M/S HIMANSHU BUILDERS won 6.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.