Competitor profile

M/S NARESH KUMAR SHARMA

They win 19% of what they bid, and 17% of the value they chase.

81tenders on record
2buyer authorities
0states
3 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
78
81 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
15
61 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4.8 Cr
of ₹28.5 Cr bid — 16.9% conversion
Win rate
19.2%
of 78 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count78 bids
19.2%
78.2%
Awarded1519.2%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected22.6%
Lost6178.2%
By value₹28.5 Cr
16.9%
81.9%
Awarded₹4.8 Cr16.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹36.1 L1.3%
Lost₹23.3 Cr81.9%

Where they win

2 authorities · 0 states

Operating states

LowHigh

15 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
S K Construction Co.16 wins · 39 shared tenders
₹6.6 Cr
won head-to-head
02
M/S HIMANSHU BUILDERS1 win · 24 shared tenders
₹37.8 L
won head-to-head
03
RD Engineers2 wins · 20 shared tenders
₹79.9 L
won head-to-head
04
AV ENTERPRISES4 wins · 19 shared tenders
₹1.2 Cr
won head-to-head
05
M/S DUGGAL CONSTRUCTION CO2 wins · 17 shared tenders
₹60.7 L
won head-to-head
06
Vee Vee Enterprises3 wins · 16 shared tenders
₹1.1 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNARESH KUMAR awardedOthers

About M/S NARESH KUMAR SHARMA

M/S NARESH KUMAR SHARMA appears as a bidder on 81 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 78 decided bids, it was awarded 15 — a 19.2% win rate — worth ₹4.8 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 3 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 73.3% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. On priced bids, its median quote is 4.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against S K Construction Co., M/S HIMANSHU BUILDERS and RD Engineers. S K Construction Co. bid on 39 of the same tenders and won 16 of them; M/S NARESH KUMAR SHARMA won 7.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.