Competitor profile

Greenway Technologies

They win 25% of what they bid, but only 0% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

4tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
1 Jul 2025last award
Total bids
4
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹0
of ₹13.0 Cr bid — 0.0% conversion
Win rate
25.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count4 bids
25.0%
25.0%
50.0%
Awarded125.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected125.0%
Lost250.0%
By value₹13.0 Cr
23.8%
76.2%
Awarded₹00.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹3.1 Cr23.8%
Lost₹9.9 Cr76.2%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Guwahati Municipal Corporation₹0

Operating states

LowHigh
Assam₹0

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
JM Infra and Enviro Technologies Pvt Ltd1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹8.1 Cr
won head-to-head
02
MAPLE ORGTECH (INDIA) LIMITED0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
NEXTGEN INFOWORLD PVT LTD0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
j sharp technology1 win · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Niletech Infrabuild (OPC) Private Limited1 win · 1 shared tender
₹3.1 Cr
won head-to-head
06
Niletech Infrabuild Pvt Ltd1 win · 1 shared tender
₹1.5 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedGreenway Technologies awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to Greenway Technologies

About Greenway Technologies

Greenway Technologies appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 25.0% win rate. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Jul 2025.

Most of its awards come from Assam. On priced bids, its median quote is 6.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against JM Infra and Enviro Technologies Pvt Ltd, MAPLE ORGTECH (INDIA) LIMITED and NEXTGEN INFOWORLD PVT LTD. JM Infra and Enviro Technologies Pvt Ltd bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; Greenway Technologies won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.