Competitor profile

MAPLE ORGTECH (INDIA) LIMITED

They win 50% of what they bid, but only 0% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

2tenders on record
2buyer authorities
2states
30 Jul 2025last award
Total bids
2
2 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹810
of ₹3.1 Cr bid — 0.0% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 2 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count2 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded150.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected150.0%
Lost00.0%
By value₹3.1 Cr
100.0%
Awarded₹8100.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹3.1 Cr100.0%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹810

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
PHOENIX FERTILIZERS AND TRADERS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Greenway Technologies0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
AGRIYA AGRO TECH1 win · 1 shared tender
₹25
won head-to-head
04
Agro Bio Tech Research Centre Ltd1 win · 1 shared tender
₹30
won head-to-head
05
AGRI BUSINESS CORPORATION1 win · 1 shared tender
₹25
won head-to-head
06
Greenvisionagroservices1 win · 1 shared tender
₹86
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMAPLE ORGTECH awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to MAPLE ORGTECH

About MAPLE ORGTECH (INDIA) LIMITED

MAPLE ORGTECH (INDIA) LIMITED appears as a bidder on 2 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 2 states. Of its 2 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹810 in total. Its most recent award on record is from 30 Jul 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Vegetable and Fruit Promotion Council Keralam, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against PHOENIX FERTILIZERS AND TRADERS, Greenway Technologies and AGRIYA AGRO TECH. PHOENIX FERTILIZERS AND TRADERS bid on 1 of the same tender and won 0 of them; MAPLE ORGTECH (INDIA) LIMITED won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.