Competitor profile

GANAPATI CONSTRUCTION

They win 14% of what they bid, and 6% of the value they chase.

45tenders on record
5buyer authorities
1state
21 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
44
45 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
6
38 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹19.6 L
of ₹3.5 Cr bid — 5.6% conversion
Win rate
13.6%
of 44 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count44 bids
13.6%
86.4%
Awarded613.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost3886.4%
By value₹3.5 Cr
94.4%
Awarded₹19.6 L5.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹3.3 Cr94.4%

Where they win

4 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

PW(ROADS)(SH)₹5.2 L26.8%
Zilla Parishad₹26,0001.3%

Operating states

LowHigh
West Bengal₹19.6 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
CHARU ENTERPRISE21 wins · 26 shared tenders
₹57.3 L
won head-to-head
02
R.S. CONSTRUCTION3 wins · 26 shared tenders
₹38,970
won head-to-head
03
SANTU BOSE0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/S SREEDURGA CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
JOY KALACHAND CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
N.G. ELECTRIC AND PIPE LINE2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹2.9 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedGANAPATI CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

About GANAPATI CONSTRUCTION

GANAPATI CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 45 government tenders on record, from 5 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 44 decided bids, it was awarded 6 — a 13.6% win rate — worth ₹19.6 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 21 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, at 67.1% of what it has won, out of 4 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from West Bengal. On priced bids, its median quote is 5.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against CHARU ENTERPRISE, R.S. CONSTRUCTION and SANTU BOSE. CHARU ENTERPRISE bid on 26 of the same tenders and won 21 of them; GANAPATI CONSTRUCTION won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.