Competitor profile

GAMA NEON SIGNS PVT LTD

They win 67% of what they bid, and 60% of the value they chase.

9tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
23 Feb 2026last award
Total bids
9
9 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
6
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹70.6 L
of ₹1.2 Cr bid — 60.2% conversion
Win rate
66.7%
of 9 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count9 bids
66.7%
33.3%
Awarded666.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost333.3%
By value₹1.2 Cr
60.2%
39.8%
Awarded₹70.6 L60.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹46.7 L39.8%

Where they win

4 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

NTPC Limited₹57.7 L81.8%
IndianOil₹6.0 L8.6%
Delhi University₹2.6 L3.7%

Operating states

LowHigh
Delhi₹4.2 L

5 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SOURABH ENGINEERS AND GRAPHICS (INDIA)0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Sabur Alam0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Arya Engineers0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Vivek Associates0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
LUHAIF DEVELOPERS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Sarthaq0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedGAMA NEON SIGNS awardedOthers

About GAMA NEON SIGNS PVT LTD

GAMA NEON SIGNS PVT LTD appears as a bidder on 9 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 9 decided bids, it was awarded 6 — a 66.7% win rate — worth ₹70.6 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 23 Feb 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is NTPC Limited, at 81.8% of what it has won, out of 4 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Delhi. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against SOURABH ENGINEERS AND GRAPHICS (INDIA), Sabur Alam and Arya Engineers. SOURABH ENGINEERS AND GRAPHICS (INDIA) bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; GAMA NEON SIGNS PVT LTD won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.