Competitor profile

CLASSIC ENTERPRISES

They win 50% of what they bid — and 93% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

2tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
1 Apr 2026last award
Total bids
2
2 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹6.7 Cr
of ₹7.2 Cr bid — 93.2% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 2 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count2 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded150.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost150.0%
By value₹7.2 Cr
93.2%
Awarded₹6.7 Cr93.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹49.5 L6.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹6.7 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
NILKAMAL LIMITED0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Durian Industries Limited0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
₹48.1 L
won head-to-head
04
MAY PROJECTS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedCLASSIC ENTERPRISES awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to CLASSIC ENTERPRISES

About CLASSIC ENTERPRISES

CLASSIC ENTERPRISES appears as a bidder on 2 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 2 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹6.7 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Apr 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against NILKAMAL LIMITED, Durian Industries Limited and PRIME EQUIPMENTS AND SUPPLIES (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED. NILKAMAL LIMITED bid on 1 of the same tender and won 0 of them; CLASSIC ENTERPRISES won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.