Competitor profile

Baljit Singh Rana-Kulwant Kaur

They win 33% of what they bid, and 42% of the value they chase.

18tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
19 Jun 2013last award
Total bids
18
18 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
6
10 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹19.2 L
of ₹45.2 L bid — 42.4% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 18 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count18 bids
33.3%
11.1%
55.6%
Awarded633.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected211.1%
Lost1055.6%
By value₹45.2 L
42.3%
17.2%
40.4%
Awarded₹19.2 L42.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹7.8 L17.2%
Lost₹18.3 L40.4%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Chandigarh₹19.2 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
PARTAP SINGH5 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹8.9 L
won head-to-head
02
AMIT AGGARWAL2 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹5.4 L
won head-to-head
03
₹1.3 L
won head-to-head
04
SHAKTI SEHGAL2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹4.4 L
won head-to-head
05
Aman Singla-Nova Enviro Engineers2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹4.8 L
won head-to-head
06
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedBaljit Singh awardedOthers

About Baljit Singh Rana-Kulwant Kaur

Baljit Singh Rana-Kulwant Kaur appears as a bidder on 18 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 18 decided bids, it was awarded 6 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹19.2 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 19 Jun 2013.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Chandigarh Administration, at 84.0% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Chandigarh. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against PARTAP SINGH, AMIT AGGARWAL and SUKHCHAIN SINGH MULTANI-HARMAN COOLING AND COSTRUCTION. PARTAP SINGH bid on 10 of the same tenders and won 5 of them; Baljit Singh Rana-Kulwant Kaur won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.