Competitor profile

AMIT AGGARWAL

They win 40% of what they bid, and 34% of the value they chase.

30tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
20 Feb 2013last award
Total bids
30
30 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
12
18 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹33.3 L
of ₹97.9 L bid — 34.0% conversion
Win rate
40.0%
of 30 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count30 bids
40.0%
60.0%
Awarded1240.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost1860.0%
By value₹97.9 L
34.0%
66.0%
Awarded₹33.3 L34.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹64.7 L66.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Chandigarh₹33.3 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
VIKAS GOGNA8 wins · 15 shared tenders
₹20.8 L
won head-to-head
02
PARTAP SINGH1 win · 6 shared tenders
₹5.4 L
won head-to-head
03
Pardeep singh-Garden Engineers4 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹13.4 L
won head-to-head
04
Baljit Singh Rana-Kulwant Kaur2 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹11.9 L
won head-to-head
05
VIKAS GOGNA-ESS ARR ENTERPRISES3 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹2.5 L
won head-to-head
06
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAMIT AGGARWAL awardedOthers

About AMIT AGGARWAL

AMIT AGGARWAL appears as a bidder on 30 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 30 decided bids, it was awarded 12 — a 40.0% win rate — worth ₹33.3 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 20 Feb 2013.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Chandigarh Administration, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Chandigarh. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against VIKAS GOGNA, PARTAP SINGH and Pardeep singh-Garden Engineers. VIKAS GOGNA bid on 15 of the same tenders and won 8 of them; AMIT AGGARWAL won 5.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.