Competitor profile

Anamul Karim Chowdhury

They win 75% of what they bid — and 86% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

4tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
7 Feb 2025last award
Total bids
4
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.8 Cr
of ₹2.1 Cr bid — 86.4% conversion
Win rate
75.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count4 bids
75.0%
25.0%
Awarded375.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected125.0%
Lost00.0%
By value₹2.1 Cr
86.4%
13.6%
Awarded₹1.8 Cr86.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹28.2 L13.6%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Irrigation Department₹1.8 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Assam₹1.8 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
JITEN CHANDRA DAS2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹99.1 L
won head-to-head
02
Abdul Salam0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
RAJ DEY0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
KALIPADA SIL1 win · 1 shared tender
₹80.6 L
won head-to-head
05
M/s S.I. Enterprise0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Amit Nath1 win · 1 shared tender
₹80.6 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAnamul Karim awardedOthers

About Anamul Karim Chowdhury

Anamul Karim Chowdhury appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 75.0% win rate — worth ₹1.8 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 7 Feb 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Irrigation Department, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Assam. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against JITEN CHANDRA DAS, Abdul Salam and RAJ DEY. JITEN CHANDRA DAS bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; Anamul Karim Chowdhury won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.