Competitor profile

Amit Nath

They win 50% of what they bid, and 42% of the value they chase.

4tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
29 Oct 2025last award
Total bids
4
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹80.6 L
of ₹1.9 Cr bid — 41.7% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count4 bids
50.0%
25.0%
25.0%
Awarded250.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected125.0%
Lost125.0%
By value₹1.9 Cr
41.7%
43.9%
14.3%
Awarded₹80.6 L41.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹84.8 L43.9%
Lost₹27.7 L14.3%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Irrigation Department₹80.6 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Assam₹80.6 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
RAJ DEY2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹76.4 L
won head-to-head
02
Fazar Ali3 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹1.6 Cr
won head-to-head
03
Mampi Nath2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹29.7 L
won head-to-head
04
M.S. Enterprise0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Ismail Mirdha1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹80.6 L
won head-to-head
06
JITEN CHANDRA DAS2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹1.1 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAmit Nath awardedOthers

About Amit Nath

Amit Nath appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹80.6 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 29 Oct 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Irrigation Department, at 100.0% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Assam. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against RAJ DEY, Fazar Ali and Mampi Nath. RAJ DEY bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; Amit Nath won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.