Competitor profile

ABDUL SAHAJAN

They win 7% of what they bid, and 10% of the value they chase.

14tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
30 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
14
14 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
12 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹16.2 L
of ₹1.6 Cr bid — 10.1% conversion
Win rate
7.1%
of 14 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count14 bids
85.7%
Awarded17.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected17.1%
Lost1285.7%
By value₹1.6 Cr
10.1%
88.5%
Awarded₹16.2 L10.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.3 L1.4%
Lost₹1.4 Cr88.5%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Zilla Parishad₹16.2 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
West Bengal₹16.2 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Abdul Hamid2 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹63.1 L
won head-to-head
02
BAPAN KUMAR DAS5 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹25.5 L
won head-to-head
03
SOPIKUL ALOM2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹9.8 L
won head-to-head
04
NEPAL BISWAS0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
MAHAFUJAR RAHAMAN BEPARI0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
SUTAPA DAS0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedABDUL SAHAJAN awardedOthers

About ABDUL SAHAJAN

ABDUL SAHAJAN appears as a bidder on 14 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 14 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 7.1% win rate — worth ₹16.2 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 30 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Zilla Parishad, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from West Bengal. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Abdul Hamid, BAPAN KUMAR DAS and SOPIKUL ALOM. Abdul Hamid bid on 6 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; ABDUL SAHAJAN won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.