Competitor profile

SUTAPA DAS

They win 22% of what they bid, and 22% of the value they chase.

67tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
21 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
67
67 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
15
38 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.7 Cr
of ₹7.4 Cr bid — 22.3% conversion
Win rate
22.4%
of 67 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count67 bids
22.4%
20.9%
56.7%
Awarded1522.4%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected1420.9%
Lost3856.7%
By value₹7.4 Cr
22.3%
30.9%
46.8%
Awarded₹1.7 Cr22.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.3 Cr30.9%
Lost₹3.5 Cr46.8%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Zilla Parishad₹70.6 L42.7%

Operating states

LowHigh
West Bengal₹1.7 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
ABUTAHER AHAMED11 wins · 43 shared tenders
₹1.5 Cr
won head-to-head
02
AHAMED ALI MANDAL9 wins · 33 shared tenders
₹62.5 L
won head-to-head
03
BELLAL HOSSAIN AND SONS1 win · 27 shared tenders
₹10.0 L
won head-to-head
04
SIRAJUL HAQUE10 wins · 20 shared tenders
₹1.7 Cr
won head-to-head
05
M/S ALAM ISLAM0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/S GOVT CONTRACTOR & SUPPLIER0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSUTAPA DAS awardedOthers

About SUTAPA DAS

SUTAPA DAS appears as a bidder on 67 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 67 decided bids, it was awarded 15 — a 22.4% win rate — worth ₹1.7 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 21 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is DISTRICT MAGISTRATE COOCH BEHAR, at 57.3% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from West Bengal. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against ABUTAHER AHAMED, AHAMED ALI MANDAL and BELLAL HOSSAIN AND SONS. ABUTAHER AHAMED bid on 43 of the same tenders and won 11 of them; SUTAPA DAS won 11.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.