Competitor profile

M/S ABDUL AZIZ

They win 40% of what they bid — and 63% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

7tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
12 Jan 2026last award
Total bids
5
7 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹17.9 Cr
of ₹28.2 Cr bid — 63.3% conversion
Win rate
40.0%
of 5 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count5 bids
40.0%
60.0%
Awarded240.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost360.0%
By value₹28.2 Cr
63.3%
36.7%
Awarded₹17.9 Cr63.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹10.4 Cr36.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

2 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
GHULAM NABI MIR2 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹8.5 Cr
won head-to-head
02
M/s MOhd Shafi Zargar0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
MS Masood Ahmed0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
MOHD TAZEEM CONTRACTOR0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
gulam rasool zargar0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/S TBA INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedABDUL AZIZ awardedOthers

About M/S ABDUL AZIZ

M/S ABDUL AZIZ appears as a bidder on 7 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 5 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 40.0% win rate — worth ₹17.9 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 12 Jan 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PMGSY Jammu and CE PW (R and B) Jammu, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.7% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against GHULAM NABI MIR, M/s MOhd Shafi Zargar and MS Masood Ahmed. GHULAM NABI MIR bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; M/S ABDUL AZIZ won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.