Competitor profile

GHULAM NABI MIR

They win 23% of what they bid, and 16% of the value they chase.

35tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
19 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
30
35 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
7
23 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹45.3 Cr
of ₹275.4 Cr bid — 16.5% conversion
Win rate
23.3%
of 30 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count30 bids
23.3%
76.7%
Awarded723.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost2376.7%
By value₹275.4 Cr
16.5%
83.5%
Awarded₹45.3 Cr16.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹230.0 Cr83.5%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

7 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
MS Masood Ahmed3 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹37.6 Cr
won head-to-head
02
RATTAN CHAND AND SONS3 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹20.8 Cr
won head-to-head
03
Tarmac Road and Roof Builders1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹8.6 Cr
won head-to-head
04
MS Ghulam Qadir Sheikh & Sons2 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹13.5 Cr
won head-to-head
05
M/S ABDUL AZIZ2 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹17.9 Cr
won head-to-head
06
M/S FAROOQ AHMED CONTRACTOR1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹4.4 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedGHULAM NABI awardedOthers

About GHULAM NABI MIR

GHULAM NABI MIR appears as a bidder on 35 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 30 decided bids, it was awarded 7 — a 23.3% win rate — worth ₹45.3 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 19 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PMGSY Jammu and CE PW (R and B) Jammu, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 9.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against MS Masood Ahmed, RATTAN CHAND AND SONS and Tarmac Road and Roof Builders. MS Masood Ahmed bid on 11 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; GHULAM NABI MIR won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.